Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill": What It Means for Your Taxes, Healthcare, and Future Finances

WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.359
Welcome to another deep dive from the road to

00:00:02.359 --> 00:00:05.179
financial empowerment by empowering your finance

00:00:05.179 --> 00:00:08.720
on Big Beautiful Bill. Today, we're really trying

00:00:08.720 --> 00:00:11.039
to cut through the noise to understand this massive

00:00:11.039 --> 00:00:14.419
new law. Trump's Big Beautiful Bill passed by

00:00:14.419 --> 00:00:17.699
Congress. What you need to know. Exactly. Our

00:00:17.699 --> 00:00:19.760
mission today is basically to equip you with

00:00:19.760 --> 00:00:22.100
the essential nuggets of knowledge. We've looked

00:00:22.100 --> 00:00:24.960
at a whole range of sources, CBS News, BBC News,

00:00:25.019 --> 00:00:27.480
The American Prospect, plus various financial

00:00:27.480 --> 00:00:29.879
analyses. We want to guide you through, you know,

00:00:29.940 --> 00:00:31.960
the core parts, the debates, and what it actually

00:00:31.960 --> 00:00:34.240
means for your finances. OK, let's unpack this.

00:00:34.359 --> 00:00:36.579
It's a really monumental piece of legislation.

00:00:36.859 --> 00:00:39.219
This big, beautiful bill, as President Trump

00:00:39.219 --> 00:00:42.159
calls it, became law on July 4th. And it was

00:00:42.159 --> 00:00:44.719
close, wasn't it? Past the House, 218 to 214.

00:00:44.799 --> 00:00:47.179
Yeah, very close. And the Senate was even tighter,

00:00:47.359 --> 00:00:50.060
51 -50. It actually needed Vice President J .D.

00:00:50.119 --> 00:00:53.140
Vance to break that tie. Wow. Okay. So what's

00:00:53.140 --> 00:00:54.539
at the heart of it? What does it fundamentally

00:00:54.539 --> 00:00:57.719
do? Well, at its core, its main focus is making

00:00:57.719 --> 00:01:00.479
most of those 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent.

00:01:00.979 --> 00:01:02.719
You know, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, they were

00:01:02.719 --> 00:01:04.620
all set to expire at the end of this year. Right.

00:01:04.620 --> 00:01:06.620
I remember that deadline looming. Exactly. So

00:01:06.620 --> 00:01:09.299
that's the big one. But beyond that, it also

00:01:09.299 --> 00:01:12.739
significantly boosts spending in a few key areas,

00:01:13.000 --> 00:01:16.500
border security, defense, and domestic energy

00:01:16.500 --> 00:01:19.310
production. Okay, big tax changes, big spending

00:01:19.310 --> 00:01:21.730
increases. The immediate question then is the

00:01:21.730 --> 00:01:24.730
price tag. What does this mean for the nation's

00:01:24.730 --> 00:01:29.450
finances? For the deficit? Yeah, that's the multi

00:01:29.450 --> 00:01:32.129
-trillion dollar question. Quite literally. The

00:01:32.129 --> 00:01:34.150
Congressional Budget Office, the CBO, they're

00:01:34.150 --> 00:01:36.709
the nonpartisan scorekeeper. They estimate this

00:01:36.709 --> 00:01:39.969
bill will add somewhere between 3 .3 and 3 .4

00:01:39.969 --> 00:01:42.030
trillion dollars to the deficit over the next

00:01:42.030 --> 00:01:44.730
10 years. 3 .3 trillion? That's hard to even

00:01:44.730 --> 00:01:47.189
picture. It really is. And, you know, some other

00:01:47.189 --> 00:01:49.450
analyses, when they factor in things like interest

00:01:49.450 --> 00:01:51.510
costs and maybe some provisions getting extended,

00:01:51.930 --> 00:01:54.049
they push that number even higher. Those sort

00:01:54.049 --> 00:01:58.250
of maybe $5 .3 trillion. $5 .3, wow. Yeah. Now,

00:01:58.450 --> 00:02:00.489
supporters, they argue this is an investment,

00:02:00.930 --> 00:02:02.769
an investment in growth and national security.

00:02:03.129 --> 00:02:05.109
But critics, they're calling it a wealth transfer.

00:02:05.530 --> 00:02:08.409
They argue it cuts support for lower income folks

00:02:08.409 --> 00:02:12.189
while giving substantial breaks to wealthier

00:02:12.189 --> 00:02:14.819
individuals and corporations. It's also worth

00:02:14.819 --> 00:02:17.000
pointing out the White House disagrees with the

00:02:17.000 --> 00:02:19.180
CBO numbers. They think they're too pessimistic

00:02:19.180 --> 00:02:21.400
Okay, so a lot of debate around the numbers themselves

00:02:21.400 --> 00:02:23.479
and you mentioned the process this went through

00:02:23.479 --> 00:02:26.419
budget reconciliation What's the significance

00:02:26.419 --> 00:02:30.039
of using that specific tool? Right. So budget

00:02:30.039 --> 00:02:32.800
reconciliation is fascinating Legislatively speaking

00:02:32.800 --> 00:02:36.340
it basically lets a bill pass the Senate with

00:02:36.340 --> 00:02:40.150
just a simple majority 51 votes It bypasses the

00:02:40.150 --> 00:02:43.090
usual 60 vote requirement to break a filibuster.

00:02:43.189 --> 00:02:45.069
Ah, okay. So that's how they got it through with

00:02:45.069 --> 00:02:47.050
that 51 -50 vote. Exactly. Now it's supposed

00:02:47.050 --> 00:02:49.110
to be for budget related items, but it often

00:02:49.110 --> 00:02:50.969
turns into what people call an everything bill.

00:02:51.449 --> 00:02:53.030
You can cram all sorts of policies in there,

00:02:53.030 --> 00:02:55.969
tax, healthcare, energy, immigration, like we

00:02:55.969 --> 00:02:58.009
see here, all bundled together without needing

00:02:58.009 --> 00:03:01.430
separate debates or votes for each part. So less

00:03:01.430 --> 00:03:04.469
scrutiny on individual pieces. Potentially, yes.

00:03:04.909 --> 00:03:07.889
It centralizes a lot of power and decision making

00:03:07.889 --> 00:03:10.810
into one single vote. It can mean less detailed

00:03:10.810 --> 00:03:13.689
deliberation. Sometimes even members voting might

00:03:13.689 --> 00:03:16.509
not know every single thing tucked inside. Right.

00:03:16.949 --> 00:03:18.909
OK, so let's get into those specifics then. What

00:03:18.909 --> 00:03:21.349
are the changes that might directly affect, you

00:03:21.349 --> 00:03:23.849
know, our listeners' wallets? Absolutely. Let's

00:03:23.849 --> 00:03:25.590
start with the tax cuts because that's probably

00:03:25.590 --> 00:03:28.789
top of mind for many. So besides making the 2017

00:03:28.789 --> 00:03:31.810
cuts permanent, the bill also permanently expands

00:03:31.810 --> 00:03:34.050
the basic standard deduction. Remember how it

00:03:34.050 --> 00:03:36.689
nearly doubled back in 2017? Yeah. Well, that

00:03:36.689 --> 00:03:39.569
wasn't to expire, too. Now it's permanent and

00:03:39.569 --> 00:03:42.189
it increases by another $1 ,000 for single filers

00:03:42.189 --> 00:03:44.710
and $2 ,000 for married couples filing jointly.

00:03:45.270 --> 00:03:48.659
But that extra bump is only until 2028. OK, so

00:03:48.659 --> 00:03:50.639
a bigger standard deduction for most people,

00:03:50.719 --> 00:03:53.000
at least for a few years. What about that salt

00:03:53.000 --> 00:03:55.819
deduction? State and local taxes. Always a huge

00:03:55.819 --> 00:03:58.360
fight. Always. Yeah, that was a major sticking

00:03:58.360 --> 00:04:00.319
point, especially for Republicans in high tax

00:04:00.319 --> 00:04:02.759
states like New York or California. So the bill

00:04:02.759 --> 00:04:05.319
does raise the cap. It goes from $10 ,000 up

00:04:05.319 --> 00:04:08.530
to $40 ,000. $40 ,000. That's a big jump. It

00:04:08.530 --> 00:04:10.710
is, but, and this is a big but, it's temporary.

00:04:11.090 --> 00:04:12.949
It only lasts for five years, then it snaps back

00:04:12.949 --> 00:04:16.250
to the $10 ,000 cap. Uh, okay, so temporary relief

00:04:16.250 --> 00:04:19.129
there. What about other specific groups? I heard

00:04:19.129 --> 00:04:21.129
there were some targeted deductions added in.

00:04:21.410 --> 00:04:24.029
Yes, quite a few actually. There's a new deduction

00:04:24.029 --> 00:04:26.519
specifically for tipped workers. They can deduct

00:04:26.519 --> 00:04:29.620
up to $25 ,000 of their tip income from federal

00:04:29.620 --> 00:04:32.319
taxes. State and local taxes would still apply,

00:04:32.439 --> 00:04:34.920
though. Interesting. Who does that help most?

00:04:35.100 --> 00:04:37.699
It phases out for individuals earning over $150

00:04:37.699 --> 00:04:40.319
,000. So it's aimed more at lower and middle

00:04:40.319 --> 00:04:43.079
income service workers. There's also a new deduction

00:04:43.079 --> 00:04:46.279
for overtime pay. And for seniors, those 65 and

00:04:46.279 --> 00:04:48.819
older, there's a new $6 ,000 bonus deduction.

00:04:49.279 --> 00:04:52.220
That one also phases out, starting at $75 ,000

00:04:52.220 --> 00:04:55.529
of income. OK. And families. Any changes to the

00:04:55.529 --> 00:04:57.810
child tax credit? Yes, the child tax credit is

00:04:57.810 --> 00:04:59.709
a permanent increase, going from the current

00:04:59.709 --> 00:05:03.230
$2 ,000 up to $2 ,200 per child, and it'll be

00:05:03.230 --> 00:05:05.629
indexed to inflation going forward. Oh, and one

00:05:05.629 --> 00:05:07.529
more, there's even a deduction for interest paid

00:05:07.529 --> 00:05:10.110
on car loans, but only for cars assembled in

00:05:10.110 --> 00:05:12.850
the U .S., and that's capped at $10 ,000. Okay,

00:05:12.970 --> 00:05:15.430
so a lot of different tax changes there, but

00:05:15.430 --> 00:05:18.699
as we said, this cost trillions. Where does the

00:05:18.699 --> 00:05:20.399
money come from? You mentioned spending reductions

00:05:20.399 --> 00:05:22.660
earlier. Let's dive into that side. Right, the

00:05:22.660 --> 00:05:24.519
flip side of the coin. And this is where the

00:05:24.519 --> 00:05:27.879
impact gets pretty significant for certain groups.

00:05:28.360 --> 00:05:30.639
The main funding sources are cuts to Medicaid

00:05:30.639 --> 00:05:34.120
and SNFP, the food stamp program. OK, Medicaid

00:05:34.120 --> 00:05:36.279
first. What's changing there? Well, the biggest

00:05:36.279 --> 00:05:38.720
change is new work requirements for some able

00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:41.139
-bodied adults without dependents. They'll need

00:05:41.139 --> 00:05:44.060
to document 80 hours a month of work, volunteering,

00:05:44.500 --> 00:05:47.600
or job training. Also, eligibility checks are

00:05:47.600 --> 00:05:49.779
going to happen more often every six months instead

00:05:49.779 --> 00:05:52.740
of annually. The Fibio estimates this combination

00:05:52.740 --> 00:05:55.500
could lead to nearly 12 million people losing

00:05:55.500 --> 00:05:57.860
their health coverage over the next decade. 12

00:05:57.860 --> 00:06:01.079
million! That's staggering. It is. There are

00:06:01.079 --> 00:06:03.560
also changes to how states fund their share of

00:06:03.560 --> 00:06:06.259
Medicaid, trying to lower provider taxes over

00:06:06.259 --> 00:06:08.939
time. Although they did add a 50 billion dollar

00:06:08.939 --> 00:06:11.560
fund to try and stabilize rural hospitals because

00:06:11.560 --> 00:06:13.399
there are huge concerns about how these cuts

00:06:13.399 --> 00:06:16.120
would hit them. OK. And what about SNAP, the

00:06:16.120 --> 00:06:18.620
Food Assistance Program? Similar story with work

00:06:18.620 --> 00:06:20.639
requirements there. They're updating the age

00:06:20.639 --> 00:06:22.839
range for those requirements for able bodied

00:06:22.839 --> 00:06:25.019
adults without dependents, expanding it from

00:06:25.019 --> 00:06:28.439
1854 up to 1864. And there's another big shift.

00:06:28.720 --> 00:06:32.040
Cost sharing with states. Starting in 2028, if

00:06:32.040 --> 00:06:34.660
a state has an error payment rate over 6%, the

00:06:34.660 --> 00:06:36.740
state itself becomes responsible for paying back

00:06:36.740 --> 00:06:40.459
5 % to 50 % of those costs. So, penalizing states

00:06:40.459 --> 00:06:42.980
for errors? Essentially, yes. The estimate is

00:06:42.980 --> 00:06:45.240
that this could affect around 600 ,000 low -income

00:06:45.240 --> 00:06:47.220
families, potentially reducing their monthly

00:06:47.220 --> 00:06:50.819
food aid by about $100. OK, so significant changes

00:06:50.819 --> 00:06:53.680
to social safety nets. Let's pivot now to where

00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:56.339
spending is increasing. Defense and border security

00:06:56.339 --> 00:06:58.779
look like big winners. Definitely. The military

00:06:58.779 --> 00:07:01.779
gets $150 billion boost. That includes monies

00:07:01.779 --> 00:07:03.959
for shipbuilding and also specifically for President

00:07:03.959 --> 00:07:06.579
Trump's Golden Dome missile defense idea. And

00:07:06.579 --> 00:07:08.220
for immigration enforcement, the numbers are

00:07:08.220 --> 00:07:11.339
really large. Over $46 .5 billion for more border

00:07:11.339 --> 00:07:14.160
wall construction, $45 billion to expand detention

00:07:14.160 --> 00:07:17.319
capacity, and $30 billion for hiring more ICE

00:07:17.319 --> 00:07:20.269
personnel. $30 billion just for hiring. Yeah,

00:07:20.490 --> 00:07:22.649
hiring and training. This boost actually makes

00:07:22.649 --> 00:07:24.930
ICE, the largest federal law enforcement agency

00:07:24.930 --> 00:07:27.170
in terms of funding its budget, goes up to $100

00:07:27.170 --> 00:07:30.970
billion through 2029. Oh, and there's a new $100

00:07:30.970 --> 00:07:33.129
fee for anyone seeking asylum at the border.

00:07:33.430 --> 00:07:35.959
OK. And the other area was energy. Sounds like

00:07:35.959 --> 00:07:38.100
a major policy shift there, too. Away from clean

00:07:38.100 --> 00:07:40.639
energy. A very significant shift, yes. The bill

00:07:40.639 --> 00:07:42.860
essentially terminates a lot of the tax incentives

00:07:42.860 --> 00:07:45.779
that were in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.

00:07:46.600 --> 00:07:48.660
So tax credits for buying new and used electric

00:07:48.660 --> 00:07:51.939
vehicles, mostly gone or phased out. Credits

00:07:51.939 --> 00:07:54.519
for installing home EV chargers or adding insulation.

00:07:54.839 --> 00:07:57.040
Same story. The greenhouse gas reduction fund

00:07:57.040 --> 00:07:59.899
has also ended. So rolling back those green incentives,

00:07:59.980 --> 00:08:02.139
what's replacing them? Well, conversely, there

00:08:02.139 --> 00:08:04.220
are new tax breaks for fossil fuel production.

00:08:04.410 --> 00:08:06.550
For example, domestic oil and gas companies get

00:08:06.550 --> 00:08:08.889
an exemption from the corporate alternative minimum

00:08:08.889 --> 00:08:11.750
tax. There are also cuts to the royalty rates

00:08:11.750 --> 00:08:14.610
companies pay for mining coal on federal land.

00:08:15.089 --> 00:08:17.230
And interestingly, metallurgical coal, the kind

00:08:17.230 --> 00:08:19.970
used in steel making, is now eligible for critical

00:08:19.970 --> 00:08:23.430
mineral subsidies until 2030. OK, so a clear

00:08:23.430 --> 00:08:26.569
pivot in energy policy. Now, you mentioned earlier

00:08:26.569 --> 00:08:29.399
that these everything bills can have some strange

00:08:29.399 --> 00:08:31.980
things tucked inside. What were some of the more,

00:08:31.980 --> 00:08:34.100
let's say, unexpected or even bizarre details

00:08:34.100 --> 00:08:37.399
you came across? Huh. Yes. There are always a

00:08:37.399 --> 00:08:41.200
few that make you raise an eyebrow. Given the

00:08:41.200 --> 00:08:43.100
everything bill nature, you find things that

00:08:43.100 --> 00:08:44.799
seem quite unrelated. For instance, remember

00:08:44.799 --> 00:08:47.519
those SNAP cost sharing changes we talked about?

00:08:47.580 --> 00:08:50.740
Yeah, making states pay for errors over 6%. Right.

00:08:51.120 --> 00:08:53.019
But some analysts pointed out a weird potential

00:08:53.019 --> 00:08:55.690
side effect. States with the highest air rates

00:08:55.690 --> 00:08:57.950
actually get a temporary exemption from that

00:08:57.950 --> 00:09:01.129
cost sharing. So, theoretically, it could, maybe

00:09:01.129 --> 00:09:03.909
unintentionally, incentivize some states to increase

00:09:03.909 --> 00:09:06.389
waste or fraud reports, at least temporarily,

00:09:06.850 --> 00:09:08.629
if their air rate is already really high and

00:09:08.629 --> 00:09:11.690
it saves them money. Huh. That's definitely counterintuitive.

00:09:11.990 --> 00:09:14.529
What else stood out as odd? Well, there's a repeal

00:09:14.529 --> 00:09:17.429
of the $200 federal tax on firearm silencers.

00:09:17.899 --> 00:09:19.799
That tax had been around for a very long time

00:09:19.799 --> 00:09:22.120
as part of gun regulation. And then there's a

00:09:22.120 --> 00:09:24.039
provision allowing cities and counties to issue

00:09:24.039 --> 00:09:27.039
tax -exempt bonds specifically to build commercial

00:09:27.039 --> 00:09:29.600
spaceports. Apparently that was pushed by a group

00:09:29.600 --> 00:09:32.860
called Space Florida. Space ports? Really? Is

00:09:32.860 --> 00:09:35.320
there more space stuff in this bill? Because

00:09:35.320 --> 00:09:37.500
that seems way out of left field for a tax and

00:09:37.500 --> 00:09:39.360
spending bill. You wouldn't think so, but yes.

00:09:39.549 --> 00:09:42.710
The bill actually allocates $10 billion specifically

00:09:42.710 --> 00:09:46.409
for Mars mission planning and $325 million to

00:09:46.409 --> 00:09:48.490
help safely de -orbit the International Space

00:09:48.490 --> 00:09:50.289
Station when it reaches the end of its life.

00:09:50.629 --> 00:09:53.210
And even $85 million to move a retired space

00:09:53.210 --> 00:09:55.990
shuttle display from Virginia to Texas. OK, Mars

00:09:55.990 --> 00:09:57.950
missions and moving space shuttles. Definitely

00:09:57.950 --> 00:10:00.710
didn't expect that. Any other weird tax tweaks?

00:10:01.049 --> 00:10:03.500
There's a subtle one affecting gambling. If you

00:10:03.500 --> 00:10:05.539
gamble, you can usually deduct your losses up

00:10:05.539 --> 00:10:07.659
to the amount of your winnings. This bill limits

00:10:07.659 --> 00:10:10.580
that deduction to only 90 % of losses. So you

00:10:10.580 --> 00:10:12.600
could actually owe taxes even if you broke even

00:10:12.600 --> 00:10:14.879
or had a net loss from gambling over the year.

00:10:15.360 --> 00:10:17.590
Ouch. That could catch some people by surprise.

00:10:17.889 --> 00:10:20.389
Definitely. And remember the salt deduction cap.

00:10:20.889 --> 00:10:23.149
While they raised it temporarily, another related

00:10:23.149 --> 00:10:25.090
provision got dropped at the last minute. It

00:10:25.090 --> 00:10:27.070
would have closed a loophole that let some high

00:10:27.070 --> 00:10:29.110
income people with pass through businesses like

00:10:29.110 --> 00:10:31.649
law partners or hedge fund managers potentially

00:10:31.649 --> 00:10:34.490
take unlimited salt deductions. Dropping that

00:10:34.490 --> 00:10:37.529
provision basically creates or rather preserves

00:10:37.529 --> 00:10:40.809
a significant tax avoidance strategy. So closing

00:10:40.809 --> 00:10:43.190
one door, leaving another open. Seems that way.

00:10:43.289 --> 00:10:45.389
Oh, and there are even tax breaks for Puerto

00:10:45.389 --> 00:10:47.710
Rican rum shipments renewed in the bill. That's

00:10:47.710 --> 00:10:49.730
kind of a classic example of long -standing,

00:10:49.750 --> 00:10:52.309
specific lobbying finding its way into major

00:10:52.309 --> 00:10:54.850
legislation. Puerto Rican rum, okay. And maybe

00:10:54.850 --> 00:10:57.409
the most baffling one, given past statements.

00:10:57.889 --> 00:11:01.950
The Cheap PS Act. Ah, yes. That one is a real

00:11:01.950 --> 00:11:04.129
head -scratcher. President Trump had previously

00:11:04.129 --> 00:11:06.570
campaigned on eliminating the Cheap PS Act entirely.

00:11:06.669 --> 00:11:09.090
That's the big bipartisan bill to boost domestic

00:11:09.090 --> 00:11:11.750
semiconductor manufacturing. But this bill...

00:11:11.789 --> 00:11:14.070
actually increases the subsidies provided by

00:11:14.070 --> 00:11:17.490
the Cheap GPS Act by about 40%. Increases them,

00:11:17.690 --> 00:11:20.210
despite wanting to scrap it. Exactly. It raises

00:11:20.210 --> 00:11:22.769
real questions about the internal consistency

00:11:22.769 --> 00:11:25.669
or maybe just the sheer complexity of putting

00:11:25.669 --> 00:11:28.350
together a bill this massive. Things slip through

00:11:28.350 --> 00:11:30.950
or compromises are made that seem contradictory.

00:11:31.250 --> 00:11:33.450
Okay, so stepping back from all these sometimes

00:11:33.450 --> 00:11:35.610
strange details and looking at the whole picture,

00:11:35.710 --> 00:11:38.929
what does this mean for us, for the listeners,

00:11:39.129 --> 00:11:41.190
for the country? What are the big takeaways here?

00:11:41.389 --> 00:11:43.470
Well, I think one takeaway is about the process

00:11:43.470 --> 00:11:46.830
itself. Budget reconciliation allows for swift

00:11:46.830 --> 00:11:50.110
action by the majority, yes, but it centralizes

00:11:50.110 --> 00:11:53.750
power and can reduce detailed debate and deliberation.

00:11:54.450 --> 00:11:57.029
Like we said, even the lawmakers voting might

00:11:57.029 --> 00:11:59.490
not grasp every consequence. That can impact

00:11:59.490 --> 00:12:02.289
accountability. And economically, while proponents

00:12:02.289 --> 00:12:05.350
are banking on growth, many economists are genuinely

00:12:05.350 --> 00:12:07.470
concerned about adding trillions to the national

00:12:07.470 --> 00:12:09.799
debt. That could mean higher interest rates down

00:12:09.799 --> 00:12:12.299
the line, impacting borrowing costs for everyone.

00:12:12.500 --> 00:12:14.620
And it also sounds like the benefits and the

00:12:14.620 --> 00:12:17.139
burdens are distributed very unevenly. That's

00:12:17.139 --> 00:12:18.820
probably the clearest takeaway from the analysis.

00:12:19.480 --> 00:12:21.840
The data suggests households earning over, say,

00:12:22.279 --> 00:12:25.899
$217 ,000 a year will see the largest average

00:12:25.899 --> 00:12:29.990
tax cuts maybe around $12 ,500 on average. Whereas

00:12:29.990 --> 00:12:33.129
households earning under $35 ,000, they might

00:12:33.129 --> 00:12:36.070
see an average cut of about $150. Huge difference.

00:12:36.309 --> 00:12:38.610
Massive difference. It points to what critics

00:12:38.610 --> 00:12:41.409
call a regressive structure. Bigger benefits

00:12:41.409 --> 00:12:43.850
percentage -wise for higher earners, while the

00:12:43.850 --> 00:12:45.909
cuts to social programs disproportionately hit

00:12:45.909 --> 00:12:48.610
those at the lower end of the income scale. Some

00:12:48.610 --> 00:12:51.389
analyses even suggest, ironically, that millions

00:12:51.389 --> 00:12:53.389
of people who might be part of the administration's

00:12:53.389 --> 00:12:56.129
own base could lose health insurance or food

00:12:56.129 --> 00:12:58.840
aid because of these changes. Right. So the impacts

00:12:58.840 --> 00:13:01.539
are complex and certainly not uniform across

00:13:01.539 --> 00:13:03.360
the board. This deep dive has really given us

00:13:03.360 --> 00:13:05.440
a much clearer, more comprehensive look at this

00:13:05.440 --> 00:13:07.460
big, beautiful bill. Yeah. I think it highlights

00:13:07.460 --> 00:13:09.500
just how much is packed into legislation like

00:13:09.500 --> 00:13:11.120
this and it raises really important questions.

00:13:11.519 --> 00:13:13.820
Questions about how we make laws, the trade -offs

00:13:13.820 --> 00:13:16.500
we accept in fiscal policy, and who ultimately

00:13:16.500 --> 00:13:19.360
benefits or bears the cost. Understanding that

00:13:19.360 --> 00:13:22.120
complexity is crucial, I think, to being an informed

00:13:22.120 --> 00:13:25.379
citizen. Absolutely. This discussion definitely

00:13:25.379 --> 00:13:28.179
gives us a lot to think about that balance between

00:13:28.179 --> 00:13:32.340
tax relief and social safety nets and just the,

00:13:32.340 --> 00:13:35.559
well, the sometimes weird details hidden in these

00:13:35.559 --> 00:13:38.519
massive bills. Indeed. And how all these different

00:13:38.519 --> 00:13:41.120
policies interact, their long -term effects on

00:13:41.120 --> 00:13:43.539
your own financial situation, and on the wider

00:13:43.539 --> 00:13:45.799
economy, it's definitely something worth mulling

00:13:45.799 --> 00:13:48.669
over. It shows how policy choices really ripple

00:13:48.669 --> 00:13:51.850
outwards. Well said. And if you, our listeners,

00:13:52.009 --> 00:13:53.929
are looking for more resources to help you navigate

00:13:53.929 --> 00:13:56.269
your personal finances, especially with changes

00:13:56.269 --> 00:13:58.789
like these potentially on the horizon, we do

00:13:58.789 --> 00:14:01.309
encourage you to visit EmpoweringYourFinance

00:14:01.309 --> 00:14:05.269
.com. That's EmpoweringYourFinance .com. Thank

00:14:05.269 --> 00:14:07.009
you so much for joining us for another dupe dive.

00:14:07.190 --> 00:14:08.789
We really hope this has given you a clearer,

00:14:08.929 --> 00:14:11.169
more insightful picture of what's in this momentous

00:14:11.169 --> 00:14:13.509
bill and ultimately why it matters to you.